The Mideastwire Blog

Excerpts from the Arab and Iranian Media & Analysis of US Policy in the Region

The NeoCon Argument on Syria: War early on would have prevented…. War

The pro-intervention crowd has always held a terrible hand when it comes to Syria. Jackson Diehl epitomizes the position. The Mike Young et al idea is simply: if only american had led a military intervention in Syria EARLIER then everything would have been much better than now.

It does not take much to realizes how obtuse this notion is (yes a war early on against an un-degraded Assad/Syria would have been a GREAT idea), but somehow they still peddle it:

“…By then Syria was already tipping into civil war. The State Department’s Syria experts recognized the peril: If Assad were not overthrown quickly, they warned in congressional testimony, the country could tip into a devastating sectarian war that would empower jihadists and spread to neighboring countries. But Obama rejected suggestions by several senators that he lead an intervention. Instead he committed a second major error, by adopting a policy of seeking to broker a Syrian solution through the United Nations. “The best thing we can do,” he said last March, “is to unify the international community…”

About these ads

Written by nickbiddlenoe

October 16, 2012 at 12:41 pm

Posted in Uncategorized


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,552 other followers

%d bloggers like this: